f.sciarrillo wrote:Newt admitted it and didn't lie ..
Ohhhh! Well, that makes it better.

Same? Same.-------->JMS
undercoverjoe wrote:So, even though he ran as Change Incarnate, Barry Hussein is going to keep the same foreign policy as Bush and you are going to blame Bush. You liberals have taken the blame game to a new level.JackANSI wrote:More critically... Was there something Bush wasn't telling everyone and Obama didn't get to know until he was elected president, which caused him to change course?
Personally, when Barack ran, I don't think he had a fucking clue! But the people ate it up. Now he's in there, and he probably had a rude awakening to the goings on that he really had no clue about.songsmith wrote:undercoverjoe wrote:So, even though he ran as Change Incarnate, Barry Hussein is going to keep the same foreign policy as Bush and you are going to blame Bush. You liberals have taken the blame game to a new level.JackANSI wrote:More critically... Was there something Bush wasn't telling everyone and Obama didn't get to know until he was elected president, which caused him to change course?
My, it sounds like a nerve was touched, there. Possibly there was a mega-f**kup we don't even know about. Maybe that's why there was talk of charges for members of the Bush White House?
You Hannitized Dittoheads have taken both short- and long-term memory loss to a new level. Don't fear, though. I won't let you forget.--->JMS
songsmith wrote:undercoverjoe wrote:So, even though he ran as Change Incarnate, Barry Hussein is going to keep the same foreign policy as Bush and you are going to blame Bush. You liberals have taken the blame game to a new level.JackANSI wrote:More critically... Was there something Bush wasn't telling everyone and Obama didn't get to know until he was elected president, which caused him to change course?
My, it sounds like a nerve was touched, there. Possibly there was a mega-f**kup we don't even know about. Maybe that's why there was talk of charges for members of the Bush White House?
You Hannitized Dittoheads have taken both short- and long-term memory loss to a new level. Don't fear, though. I won't let you forget.--->JMS
It isn't the same because he didn't look in the face of the American people, and congress, and lie about it. Of course, if he would have lied; then I would be giving him the same disrespectful story as Clinton.songsmith wrote:f.sciarrillo wrote:Newt admitted it and didn't lie ..
Ohhhh! Well, that makes it better.![]()
Same? Same.-------->JMS
Newt Gingrich led the charge against Clinton for his moral terpitude and lack of "values." WHILE he was having an affair himself.f.sciarrillo wrote:It isn't the same because he didn't look in the face of the American people, and congress, and lie about it. Of course, if he would have lied; then I would be giving him the same disrespectful story as Clinton.songsmith wrote:f.sciarrillo wrote:Newt admitted it and didn't lie ..
Ohhhh! Well, that makes it better.![]()
Same? Same.-------->JMS
It doesn't matter who led the charges. What matters is that one lied and the other didn't ...songsmith wrote:Newt Gingrich led the charge against Clinton for his moral terpitude and lack of "values." WHILE he was having an affair himself.f.sciarrillo wrote:It isn't the same because he didn't look in the face of the American people, and congress, and lie about it. Of course, if he would have lied; then I would be giving him the same disrespectful story as Clinton.songsmith wrote:
Ohhhh! Well, that makes it better.![]()
Same? Same.-------->JMS
Same? Yep, still same.-------->JMS
If you think he was having an affair, and never lied about it to anyone, or covered it up... I don't think you understand how affairs work. To prosecute someone else for what you're currently doing? I don't think you understand how hypocrisy works, either.f.sciarrillo wrote:It doesn't matter who led the charges. What matters is that one lied and the other didn't ...songsmith wrote:Newt Gingrich led the charge against Clinton for his moral terpitude and lack of "values." WHILE he was having an affair himself.f.sciarrillo wrote: It isn't the same because he didn't look in the face of the American people, and congress, and lie about it. Of course, if he would have lied; then I would be giving him the same disrespectful story as Clinton.
Same? Yep, still same.-------->JMS
songsmith wrote:5.Kenneth Starr's successor as Independent Counsel, Robert Ray, released a report in September 2000 that stated "This office determined that the evidence was insufficient to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that either President or Mrs. Clinton knowingly participated in any criminal conduct."
6.Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote, party lines) and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote, also largely along party lines). Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote) and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148-285 vote). Such a vote does not require a preponderance of evidence, and indeed, the Ray Report concluded as such.
7.The Speaker-designate Representative Bob Livingston, chosen by the Republican Party Conference to replace outgoing Speaker Newt Gingrich, announced the end of his candidacy for Speaker and his resignation from Congress from the floor of the house after Livingston's own marital infidelity came to light.
8.Contemporaneously, some media reported on house manager Henry Hyde's marital infidelity of several decades prior.
9. The GOP Congress also passed the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994, when the original "independent counsel" was set to expire, without enough evidence for a conviction on original charges. Evidence was never found.
10. I could find no research on any mob connection.
In short, the witch hunt ended with Congress nailing Bubba for nailing Monica, and little else. It marked the zenith for Rovian politics. I wonder what we'd find if there was an "independent counsel" investigation into the Iraq War, or ironically, Blackwater, or Halliburton?--->JMS
1st of all, my reference was from the Congressional record--you know, that little source of record thingie? The only time I see or hear Rush Limbaugh is when he makes the news. {smacks Johnny upside the head so he remembers next time}.songsmith wrote:Yes, I remember the witch hunt, I was paying attention then. What I saw was a guy telling the world he didn't cheat on his wife, when he actually had. In order to have an affair, there has to be lies involved. Extramarital affairs are very common. We're all quite aware of that.
The reason for the investigation was Whitewater. Extramarital affairs had nothing to do whatsoever with Whitewater. Bill Clinton still left office with the highest public acceptance numbers of any president.
As for the Wiki reference, I'm sure you'll credit Rush next time as well.--->JMS