Take a "Drug Test",...I mean a "Drug Quiz.
- slackin@dabass
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:51 pm
- Location: tyrone, pa
- Contact:
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:08 am
- Location: Altoona,Pa
- RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:47 pm
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
- slackin@dabass
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:51 pm
- Location: tyrone, pa
- Contact:
- RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:47 pm
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
They didn't say it wasn't addictive. They said the withdrawal syptoms were mild, and they are. For me it was insomnia and inability to deal with boredom. No shakes, no DT's, no coke bugs, no nausea, nothing you can't handle.RobTheDrummer wrote:Well you can argue that it's not addictive, it is. Anything can be addictive if you like it a lot. They say it doesn't cause cancer. I'll bet you it does, inhaling smoke is not good for you at all. They say it protects brain cells? That's bullshit too.
It was indeed, biased towards MJ. Welcome to the New Media. It's never objective, sometimes it's in your favor, sometimes it's not.
There's not much data for MJ causing cancer, and most data comes from obvious pot-haters. It's political, like golbal warming. I don't know about protecting brain-cells... it's likely saved a few by allowing the user to not blow his brain-cells out with a shotgun.

