How Low Will He Go?

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:29 pm

Hawk wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:
Hawk wrote: Yeah, that's specfic.

"After looking at it for the last half hour"...five laughs for you for not knowing what his policies are while you were claiming to hate them.

I thought you knew them, well, not really, I knew you didn't.
It would take a couple of pages to describe them all. I'm not to get carpel to appease you, as you seem to think this is some kind of joke ..

It is obvious that you are in love with him and I am not.
All I ask for was specifics and you can't do it. You even had to research what they are.

Yes, you hate him because Beck and Limbaugh do. You can add NOTHING to a conversation unless they put it in your head. You know nothing and prove it so often you make me sick. Why you blindly follow their lead I'll never know. I have little respect for someone who knows so little yet has so much to say. At least undercoverjoe, lonewolf, Robthedrummer and other right wingers/Libertarians know what THEY'RE talking about.

I like some of Obama's policies, that's hardly love.

So you think that every one who is against what Obama is doing only listen to beck and limbaugh? That is so inconsistent that it isn't funny ...

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:38 am

f.sciarrillo wrote:
Hawk wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote: It would take a couple of pages to describe them all. I'm not to get carpel to appease you, as you seem to think this is some kind of joke ..

It is obvious that you are in love with him and I am not.
All I ask for was specifics and you can't do it. You even had to research what they are.

Yes, you hate him because Beck and Limbaugh do. You can add NOTHING to a conversation unless they put it in your head. You know nothing and prove it so often you make me sick. Why you blindly follow their lead I'll never know. I have little respect for someone who knows so little yet has so much to say. At least undercoverjoe, lonewolf, Robthedrummer and other right wingers/Libertarians know what THEY'RE talking about.

I like some of Obama's policies, that's hardly love.
So you think that every one who is against what Obama is doing only listen to beck and limbaugh? That is so inconsistent that it isn't funny ...

Of course not. Did you read what I said ? (NO) The other right wingers know what their talking about. You are the only one who has no clue what your talking about, as I proved over and over.

Colton · Post by **Colton** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:16 am

Hawk wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:
Hawk wrote: All I ask for was specifics and you can't do it. You even had to research what they are.

Yes, you hate him because Beck and Limbaugh do. You can add NOTHING to a conversation unless they put it in your head. You know nothing and prove it so often you make me sick. Why you blindly follow their lead I'll never know. I have little respect for someone who knows so little yet has so much to say. At least undercoverjoe, lonewolf, Robthedrummer and other right wingers/Libertarians know what THEY'RE talking about.

I like some of Obama's policies, that's hardly love.
So you think that every one who is against what Obama is doing only listen to beck and limbaugh? That is so inconsistent that it isn't funny ...
Of course not. Did you read what I said ? (NO) The other right wingers know what their talking about. You are the only one who has no clue what your talking about, as I proved over and over.

I just wanted to quote this monster.

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:28 am

For the sake of band width (is that the term) let's stop the "full" quotes.

Or as (fill in the blank) might say. Just stop altogether.

songsmith · Post by **songsmith** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:31 am

What an effed-up thing to bawl-baby about. So he didn't know the secret fucking handshake, so what? I don't hear the sound of soldiers marching in the streets, so everything must still be okay.
Sometimes the douche-nozzles amaze me.

--->JMS

lonewolf · Post by **lonewolf** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:41 pm

JackANSI wrote:Whats wrong with showing respect for other cultures?

In Japanese culture, the depth of Obama's bow would not be interpreted as respect, it would be interpreted as submissive.

A downward nod of the head was the appropriate gesture, but then I wouldn't expect Obama to know much about anything besides campaigning and Chicago style politics.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot. Obama also has extensive Harvard training at convoluting the Constitution.

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:51 pm

lonewolf wrote:
JackANSI wrote:Whats wrong with showing respect for other cultures?
In Japanese culture, the depth of Obama's bow would not be interpreted as respect, it would be interpreted as submissive.

A downward nod of the head was the appropriate gesture, but then I wouldn't expect Obama to know much about anything besides campaigning and Chicago style politics.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot. Obama also has extensive Harvard training at convoluting the Constitution.

What was the interpretation when Bush senior vomited onto the Japanese prime minister?

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:58 pm

lonewolf wrote:
JackANSI wrote:Whats wrong with showing respect for other cultures?
In Japanese culture, the depth of Obama's bow would not be interpreted as respect, it would be interpreted as submissive.

A downward nod of the head was the appropriate gesture, but then I wouldn't expect Obama to know much about anything besides campaigning and Chicago style politics.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot. Obama also has extensive Harvard training at convoluting the Constitution.

You (plural) criticize Obama for not knowing proper protocol, Yet W knew nothing of the Middle East Culture ("We will be treated as great liberators" - "Mission Accomplished") including the predictable civil war between various factions like Sunnis and Shiites and no criticism from you for that ?

At least Obama studies the Middle East situation before he makes a decision.

lonewolf · Post by **lonewolf** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:27 pm

Hawk wrote:
lonewolf wrote:
JackANSI wrote:Whats wrong with showing respect for other cultures?
In Japanese culture, the depth of Obama's bow would not be interpreted as respect, it would be interpreted as submissive.

A downward nod of the head was the appropriate gesture, but then I wouldn't expect Obama to know much about anything besides campaigning and Chicago style politics.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot. Obama also has extensive Harvard training at convoluting the Constitution.
You (plural) criticize Obama for not knowing proper protocol, Yet W knew nothing of the Middle East Culture ("We will be treated as great liberators" - "Mission Accomplished") including the predictable civil war between various factions like Sunnis and Shiites and no criticism from you for that ?

At least Obama studies the Middle East situation before he makes a decision.

W? He's ancient history. Why do you even bother with him...he's just a good old boy who hosts a lot of big barbeques in Texas. Every time you feel the need mention W, it just emphasizes Obama's own inadequacies.

What you call studying, I call deadly indecision. As Obama "studies" the middle east, US troops are dying there in ever-increasing numbers.

What is there to study? Months ago, Obama's hand-picked general told him what he needs to finish the job in Afghanistan. The problem is cut, dried, laid out in black and white and in desperate need of a decision.

Meanwhile, American deaths are escalating because Obama won't make a decision because he lacks the political balls to offend the flaming extreme liberal left-wing that runs his party and got him elected.

JackANSI · Post by **JackANSI** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:55 pm

lonewolf wrote:
Hawk wrote:
lonewolf wrote: In Japanese culture, the depth of Obama's bow would not be interpreted as respect, it would be interpreted as submissive.

A downward nod of the head was the appropriate gesture, but then I wouldn't expect Obama to know much about anything besides campaigning and Chicago style politics.

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot. Obama also has extensive Harvard training at convoluting the Constitution.
You (plural) criticize Obama for not knowing proper protocol, Yet W knew nothing of the Middle East Culture ("We will be treated as great liberators" - "Mission Accomplished") including the predictable civil war between various factions like Sunnis and Shiites and no criticism from you for that ?

At least Obama studies the Middle East situation before he makes a decision.
W? He's ancient history. Why do you even bother with him...he's just a good old boy who hosts a lot of big barbeques in Texas. Every time you feel the need mention W, it just emphasizes Obama's own inadequacies.

Be sure to remember you said that when Obama's been out of office for under a year.

It would be different to me if it was the emperor visiting the US.. but Obama is at the guys house for crying out loud. Personally I think its not that big fo a friggin deal.. I'll take some kind of respect for other's cultures over none at all.

Stupid Americans...

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:07 pm

JackANSI wrote:
lonewolf wrote:
Hawk wrote: You (plural) criticize Obama for not knowing proper protocol, Yet W knew nothing of the Middle East Culture ("We will be treated as great liberators" - "Mission Accomplished") including the predictable civil war between various factions like Sunnis and Shiites and no criticism from you for that ?

At least Obama studies the Middle East situation before he makes a decision.
W? He's ancient history. Why do you even bother with him...he's just a good old boy who hosts a lot of big barbeques in Texas. Every time you feel the need mention W, it just emphasizes Obama's own inadequacies.
Be sure to remember you said that when Obama's been out of office for under a year.

It would be different to me if it was the emperor visiting the US.. but Obama is at the guys house for crying out loud. Personally I think its not that big fo a friggin deal.. I'll take some kind of respect for other's cultures over none at all.

Stupid Americans...

I never blame the previous admin. In fact the only previous admin I blame for anything is Clinton and the terrorists attacks that lead up to 9/11. But that is another debate all together ..

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:06 pm

Hawk wrote:
What was the interpretation when Bush senior vomited onto the Japanese prime minister?

That he was sick?

timemoney0 · Post by **timemoney0** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:45 am

Now if Hawk would let him sit in on the druns some Sunday at Claudio's..........THAT would be love

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:05 am

timemoney0 wrote:Now if Hawk would let him sit in on the druns some Sunday at Claudio's..........THAT would be love

Sunday December 6th. Open (to anyone who wants to play) Blues Jam with The Hawks. 6:00 start. 30 Something

Anyone can play my drums

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:11 am

I bring up Bush because someone with a total lack of facts doesn't know that there was a deficit BEFORE OBAMA. Does anyone else want to make an attempt at educating this poor fool ? I dare you, he only believes it if Fox or Limbaugh says it - and they are biased (shhh, he doesn't know they're biased).

tornandfrayed · Post by **tornandfrayed** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:55 pm

Ah political posts! Anyone want to see my asshole? Well here it is!

The war should end today. Obamma promised change and has yet to deliver.

"Yes he can!" but will he?

Troops are dying because of a war, not because of any other reason. You know that Jeff.

Health care in America sucks! If you don't know that then you ain't been sick.

Some self professed Conservative Christians on this board are actually exactly what Jesus hated most, Pharisees. (people who flaunt their religion and wear it like a jewel on their breast)

On the other hand, I love the cover of Newsweek.

I think that every (almost) opinion on here is valid (see above).

Regardless of wether the Dems or the GOP are ass fucking the country we will endure...

We have to.

Now show us yours!

lonewolf · Post by **lonewolf** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:55 pm

tornandfrayed wrote:Troops are dying because of a war, not because of any other reason. You know that Jeff.

Yes, but if you would have paid closer attention to my statement, you would have noticed the word:

escalating

and the phrase:

ever-increasing numbers

Afghanistan is getting a lot worse very quickly. The President's #1 constitutional job above all others is that of Commander-In-Chief. Our President was given his options 6 months ago and he has done NOTHING.

He needs to decide whether to fight the war or pull out. If he decides to fight and go with his general's recommendations, he needs to do it right now because the critically important window for deployment in the spring is rapidly closing.

RobTheDrummer · Post by **RobTheDrummer** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:14 pm

Troops die because they are basically handcuffed and aren't allowed to fight a war. They are afraid to shoot at anything in fear of being sued. Let the boys fight like they know how, and this thing would have been over in 2004.

nakedtwister · Post by **nakedtwister** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:55 pm

Here's an option. Pull the troops out. You can't chase a rat out of his hole if you're standing at the entrance. Put a little peanut butter on a plate and when the false sense of security hits him send in the drones armed with the poison. If Bin Laden is alive, he will come out of his hole. It would save a hell of a lot of money. We could actually do it State side. No need for troops to even be there. B

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:39 pm

nakedtwister wrote:Here's an option. Pull the troops out. You can't chase a rat out of his hole if you're standing at the entrance. Put a little peanut butter on a plate and when the false sense of security hits him send in the drones armed with the poison. If Bin Laden is alive, he will come out of his hole. It would save a hell of a lot of money. We could actually do it State side. No need for troops to even be there. B

I have a plan - Why don't we just bomb every nook and cranny of that sand castle, we are bound to get the fish sooner or later ..

nakedtwister · Post by **nakedtwister** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:08 pm

I have a plan - Why don't we just bomb every nook and cranny of that sand castle, we are bound to get the fish sooner or later ..

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:17 pm

nakedtwister wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:I have a plan - Why don't we just bomb every nook and cranny of that sand castle, we are bound to get the fish sooner or later ..

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

true, but think of nice parking lot it would make ...

nakedtwister · Post by **nakedtwister** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:54 pm

A giant Drive- In theater

lonewolf · Post by **lonewolf** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:57 pm

One phrase:

The GBU-28 Deep Throat Super-Bunker-Buster

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuniKsBxZ10

nakedtwister · Post by **nakedtwister** » Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:14 pm

lonewolf wrote:One phrase:

The GBU-28 Deep Throat Super-Bunker-Buster

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuniKsBxZ10

Ok a XXX Drive - In theater then.