New Palin garbage to think and laugh about
Palin's relationship to the Alaskan party that wants to seperate from the USA. It is Palin who is a traitor !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmt0rLtgmK0
She has a very wacky church pastor, who is off the wall. Much worse than the Rev. Wright. They believe that the president is a representative of God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VtF7Ypr ... re=related
You can find many examples of her kooky church.
Now she is in trouble for abuse of power. She left her little town (as Mayor) with a huge deficit. She is Bush with lipstick, but worse.
She just plain scares me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmt0rLtgmK0
She has a very wacky church pastor, who is off the wall. Much worse than the Rev. Wright. They believe that the president is a representative of God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VtF7Ypr ... re=related
You can find many examples of her kooky church.
Now she is in trouble for abuse of power. She left her little town (as Mayor) with a huge deficit. She is Bush with lipstick, but worse.
She just plain scares me.
- Gallowglass
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 793
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:40 pm
- Location: Hlidskjalf
What's wrong with that? I support secessionist movements. I also think they are Constitutionally valid. Many states' constitutions include secession clauses and have been ratified as acceptable. Many times I have thought about joining the "Free Staters" in NH, the Montana secessionists (including support from the Governor), or the Lakota Nation. I guess I'm a traitor.Hawk wrote:Palin's relationship to the Alaskan party that wants to seperate from the USA. It is Palin who is a traitor !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmt0rLtgmK0
Her pastor is kooky, but I don't know if he's any worse than Wright. I think you're just mining for subjective points that support your "tit for tat" position. Black Liberation "theology" is just racism with a religious front. Wright's a hater. I find him unacceptable and despicable. Palin's Assembly of God pastor may be a nut-job, but I don't see him surrounded by so much hate (unless you're a witchHawk wrote:She has a very wacky church pastor, who is off the wall. Much worse than the Rev. Wright. They believe that the president is a representative of God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VtF7Ypr ... re=related
You can find many examples of her kooky church.

How could you be worse than Bush?Hawk wrote:Now she is in trouble for abuse of power. She left her little town (as Mayor) with a huge deficit. She is Bush with lipstick, but worse.
She scares me too.Hawk wrote:She just plain scares me.
Joe, the difference is conceptual. They are making things up about Obama in order to scare you.undercoverjoe wrote:Bill, are you becoming a Hater like John McCain, with all this negative posting about the Republican ticket?
With Palin, I'm just giving you some hard facts to help you create an opinion.
I'm rubber, you're glue.Hawk wrote:Joe, the difference is conceptual. They are making things up about Obama in order to scare you.undercoverjoe wrote:Bill, are you becoming a Hater like John McCain, with all this negative posting about the Republican ticket?
With Palin, I'm just giving you some hard facts to help you create an opinion.
The associations with socialist radical domestic terrorist is true. Not an opinion. The association with convicted felon and political sugar daddy Tony Rezko is real. The 20 year relationship with America hater, racists minister Wright is real, not an opinion. He baptized his children, married him and Barry Hussien used a sermon from Wright for the basis of his first published book. He was fine for 20 years, but as soon as a Youtube video showed how racist he was, goodbye minister, dropped like a hot potato.
These things are not made up, no matter how much you love the Messiah.
BTW, Palin is just a big government republican, no different than most of them in DC right now that got us into this mess.
The difference IS, Obama denounced what the Rev. Wright said. Palin lives by what her preacher and her kooky church teaches. That's a HUGE difference.Gallowglass wrote:What's wrong with that? I support secessionist movements. I also think they are Constitutionally valid. Many states' constitutions include secession clauses and have been ratified as acceptable. Many times I have thought about joining the "Free Staters" in NH, the Montana secessionists (including support from the Governor), or the Lakota Nation. I guess I'm a traitor.Hawk wrote:Palin's relationship to the Alaskan party that wants to seperate from the USA. It is Palin who is a traitor !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmt0rLtgmK0
Her pastor is kooky, but I don't know if he's any worse than Wright. I think you're just mining for subjective points that support your "tit for tat" position. Black Liberation "theology" is just racism with a religious front. Wright's a hater. I find him unacceptable and despicable. Palin's Assembly of God pastor may be a nut-job, but I don't see him surrounded by so much hate (unless you're a witchHawk wrote:She has a very wacky church pastor, who is off the wall. Much worse than the Rev. Wright. They believe that the president is a representative of God.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VtF7Ypr ... re=related
You can find many examples of her kooky church.)
How could you be worse than Bush?Hawk wrote:Now she is in trouble for abuse of power. She left her little town (as Mayor) with a huge deficit. She is Bush with lipstick, but worse.
She scares me too.Hawk wrote:She just plain scares me.
Joe, if one is guilty by association (and it has been proven that they were not close) , If one is guilty by association - many people have seen you talk to ME - Joe, therefore, must be a commy socialist. We now have indisputable conformation of that (since that is how you like to refer to me) - you are...well...my comrad !
Joe, bring some facts to the table. Rather than your continued rhetoric that preaches each man for himself and screw the underdog. It's obvious to everyone that whatever I say, (you are anti Bush, the biggest spender in history) yet you constantly defend the Republicans McCain / Palin when every time I speak against them. McCain is with Bush on nearly everything. The 10% of things he was against (tax reduction to the top 4%) he is now for. Making him even closer to Bush.
Yeah, I already get you.
Joe, bring some facts to the table. Rather than your continued rhetoric that preaches each man for himself and screw the underdog. It's obvious to everyone that whatever I say, (you are anti Bush, the biggest spender in history) yet you constantly defend the Republicans McCain / Palin when every time I speak against them. McCain is with Bush on nearly everything. The 10% of things he was against (tax reduction to the top 4%) he is now for. Making him even closer to Bush.
Yeah, I already get you.

- Gallowglass
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 793
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:40 pm
- Location: Hlidskjalf
Maybe. I don't know if I buy the idea that Obama ditched Wright for anything other than political expedience. I guess I can admire Palin's loyalty, if nothing else. She's still a nut-job. Really the only difference between Obama and Palin is that he's an empty suit and she's an empty skirt. Either one would be bad for the country. I guess the question you have to ask yourself is "which way do you want to go bankrupt ?".Hawk wrote:...The difference IS, Obama denounced what the Rev. Wright said. Palin lives by what her preacher and her kooky church teaches. That's a HUGE difference.
I need to remind you that trickle down economics developed by Ronald Reagan and initially called "Voodoo Economics" by George Bush #1 hasn't worked and is the biggest cause for our deficit.Gallowglass wrote:Maybe. I don't know if I buy the idea that Obama ditched Wright for anything other than political expedience. I guess I can admire Palin's loyalty, if nothing else. She's still a nut-job. Really the only difference between Obama and Palin is that he's an empty suit and she's an empty skirt. Either one would be bad for the country. I guess the question you have to ask yourself is "which way do you want to go bankrupt ?".Hawk wrote:...The difference IS, Obama denounced what the Rev. Wright said. Palin lives by what her preacher and her kooky church teaches. That's a HUGE difference.
Of our entire deficit, Reagan, Bush and Bush are responsible for about 80% of it ! Clinton left his post with a surplus.
So if you are voting by which is more fiscally responsible, that would be Obama.
McCain has repeatedly voted with Bush and will continue to spend like Bush, and, like Bush, will let the next generation pay for it.
Not made up, just given extraordinary importance by, um, the other team.undercoverjoe wrote: These things are not made up, no matter how much you love the Messiah.
Sorry, dude, I'm not afraid of socialists or terrorists or people whose names sound Arabic. Ayers isn't hiding in a spiderhole in Afghanistan, if he's such a threat, just go get him, he lives in Chicago and teaches at a university. If he's drawn the blood of American patriots, go get him. If Rezko is bankrolling Jihad In America, arrest him and send him to Gitmo. I have a background in religious kookiness, and Sarah Palin speaking in tongues really does frighten me, not because she's a nut (shoe, meet foot...foot, shoe...wow, nice fit), but because it makes it okay for that kind of gobbledygook to be considered "normal." No one religious group can rule the US, it's in the Constitution, that's a major reason we broke away from England. I know charismatic evangelicals VERY well, and that is what they want... control. A world free of Satan, which includes all ideas not pastor-approved. You want to see somebody who's dangerous in office? If they deny proven scientific fact in favor of the beliefs of a small group, who's next? They think Catholicism is a cult. They think God must favor America over any other country. They think that if you don't speak in tongues, they are closer to God than you. They think you can "pray away the gay." They think at The Rapture, they will go to Heaven and you will stay here. They think pot and heroin do the same thing. They think the Bible should be translated literally, that there are no metaphors or parables, only direct law. Worst of all, they think they have the right to judge you by their standards, because their standards are God's standards.
These things are far more dangerous than knowing somebody who was arrested once.--------->JMS
So if you are voting by which is more fiscally responsible, that would be Obama. ...quote by Bill.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
This extremist socialist is proposing over a trillion dollars worth of government spending while we are on the verge of a great depression. I once read that 1 out of every 4 votes he made in his career included tax increases.
McCain will keep our military on empire status with US military in over 700 bases in 130 some countries. This will also bankrupt us.
Do not vote for McBama this election.
There are other choices in the Libertarian and Constitutional Parties.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
This extremist socialist is proposing over a trillion dollars worth of government spending while we are on the verge of a great depression. I once read that 1 out of every 4 votes he made in his career included tax increases.
McCain will keep our military on empire status with US military in over 700 bases in 130 some countries. This will also bankrupt us.
Do not vote for McBama this election.
There are other choices in the Libertarian and Constitutional Parties.
I thought you were smart enough to NOT believe the Republican rhetoric. I was wrong.undercoverjoe wrote:So if you are voting by which is more fiscally responsible, that would be Obama. ...quote by Bill.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
This extremist socialist is proposing over a trillion dollars worth of government spending while we are on the verge of a great depression. I once read that 1 out of every 4 votes he made in his career included tax increases.
McCain will keep our military on empire status with US military in over 700 bases in 130 some countries. This will also bankrupt us.
Do not vote for McBama this election.
There are other choices in the Libertarian and Constitutional Parties.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008 ... tions.html
I know there is more proof of how wrong you are, but I don't have time to look for it right now.
undercoverjoe is now "socialistjoe" because I saw him with ME - And joe calls me a socialist. Guilt by association.
Hawk posted.....undercoverjoe is now "socialistjoe" because I saw him with ME - And joe calls me a socialist. Guilt by association.
To call this post infantile is to give it too much credit. I would say that is about second or maybe third grade reasoning. Just the type of voter Barrack Hussien is looking for.
To call this post infantile is to give it too much credit. I would say that is about second or maybe third grade reasoning. Just the type of voter Barrack Hussien is looking for.
Just sarcasm showing your mentality with Husain the friend of a terrorist. But you already knew that.undercoverjoe wrote:Hawk posted.....undercoverjoe is now "socialistjoe" because I saw him with ME - And joe calls me a socialist. Guilt by association.
To call this post infantile is to give it too much credit. I would say that is about second or maybe third grade reasoning. Just the type of voter Barrack Hussien is looking for.
It goes way beyond being a friend with a terrorist. He worked with Ayers for years on the Annenberg Challenge funds (over 1 million dollars Barry Hussein was in charge of to radicalize and socialize schools). He also had his inaugural political fundraiser at his house.
That sounds a little bit more that just friends. (I think he got to at least third base, politically, with William Ayers)
That sounds a little bit more that just friends. (I think he got to at least third base, politically, with William Ayers)

undercoverjoe wrote:It goes way beyond being a friend with a terrorist. He worked with Ayers for years on the Annenberg Challenge funds (over 1 million dollars Barry Hussein was in charge of to radicalize and socialize schools). He also had his inaugural political fundraiser at his house.
That sounds a little bit more that just friends. (I think he got to at least third base, politically, with William Ayers)
socialistjoe,
Yeah, I get you already. But read this:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008 ... ayers.html