Rush Limbaugh to be a Miss America Judge ..

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:16 am

Is this interesting or what ?

http://themoderatevoice.com/49142/rush- ... ant-judge/

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:26 pm

this idiot is barred from owning a football team.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... AD9BAOQK00

WTG Goodell! You don't need him.

Post by **Ron** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:57 pm

Commissioner Goodell wrote: "I have said many times before that we are all held to a higher standard here."

Hahahahahaha!

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:18 pm

Ron wrote:
Commissioner Goodell wrote: "I have said many times before that we are all held to a higher standard here."
Hahahahahaha!

Ron, I don't get the joke? I'll bet I'm not the only one.

Post by **Ron** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:59 pm

It's that Rush doesn't fit the NFL's "higher standard" for team owners.

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:02 pm

Who could actually fit the standard set by Al Davis?

witchhunt · Post by **witchhunt** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:14 pm

undercoverjoe wrote:Who could actually fit the standard set by Al Davis?

Someone willing to physically beat the players into shape.

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:24 pm

witchhunt wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:Who could actually fit the standard set by Al Davis?
Someone willing to physically beat the players into shape.

When was the last time Al Davis physically beat a player into shape?

witchhunt · Post by **witchhunt** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:42 pm

undercoverjoe wrote:
witchhunt wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:Who could actually fit the standard set by Al Davis?
Someone willing to physically beat the players into shape.
When was the last time Al Davis physically beat a player into shape?

Not Davis personally...
http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/09/nfl-vi ... s-jaw.html

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:19 pm

The comments he made as a sports commentator are still haunting him ...

Flaw · Post by **Flaw** » Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:33 pm

Ron wrote:
Commissioner Goodell wrote: "I have said many times before that we are all held to a higher standard here."
Hahahahahaha!

this is the greatest thing i have read in years... goodell reinstates vick and he held a dog fighting organization, and when Rush tries to purchase a team they have higher standards. oh that is great that mike vick is viewed as a better person then rush.

songsmith · Post by **songsmith** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:42 pm

Flaw wrote:
Ron wrote:
Commissioner Goodell wrote: "I have said many times before that we are all held to a higher standard here."
Hahahahahaha!

this is the greatest thing i have read in years... goodell reinstates vick and he held a dog fighting organization, and when Rush tries to purchase a team they have higher standards. oh that is great that mike vick is viewed as a better person then rush.

Only slightly better.

--->JMS

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:57 pm

Ron wrote:It's that Rush doesn't fit the NFL's "higher standard" for team owners.

I still don't get it. Everyone is judged on their own merit. we don't need overt racists owning football teams

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:25 pm

I think Don Imus should join Rush as well.

witchhunt · Post by **witchhunt** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:27 pm

Hawk wrote:I think Don Imus should join Rush as well.

C'mon. At least Imus does some good in this world.

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:05 pm

gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams

Can you prove that Rush is a racist?

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:20 pm

undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams
Can you prove that Rush is a racist?

if i do would you agree the ban is the right thing to do?

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:00 pm

gosteelers wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams
Can you prove that Rush is a racist?
if i do would you agree the ban is the right thing to do?

What is your definition of overt racist?

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:10 pm

undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote: Can you prove that Rush is a racist?
if i do would you agree the ban is the right thing to do?
What is your definition of overt racist?

you want to split hairs now..

http://espn.go.com/gen/news/2003/1001/1628537.html

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:15 pm

gosteelers wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: if i do would you agree the ban is the right thing to do?
What is your definition of overt racist?
you want to split hairs now..

http://espn.go.com/gen/news/2003/1001/1628537.html

No, just your definition. If you are a modern socialist, you would say that anyone that thinks that B. Hussein is terrible for this country is a racist. That's what most of the media did in reaction to Rush.

songsmith · Post by **songsmith** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:41 pm

undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams
Can you prove that Rush is a racist?

Rush proves he is a racist over and over again. He brings up race usually once a show lately. And sexism. And he says that Tear-Partiers accomplish nothing.
No, sir, Rush is a Rushist. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, son of a lawyer/judge, and has never done an honest day's work in his life. His 4 marriages prove that he has no real morality, and no concern for anyone but himself. If he feels the need to say something racist, he just says it... it's that sense of self-entitlement that pervades the right, and he convinces other wingnuts that they're entitled as well.
He's busy digging his hole the last few weeks. It's a short matter of time until he climbs in and covers himself. That he's hoisting himself on his own petard is simply icing on a big, fat, loudmouthed cake.

--->JMS

Flaw · Post by **Flaw** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:31 pm

songsmith wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams
Can you prove that Rush is a racist?
Rush proves he is a racist over and over again. He brings up race usually once a show lately. And sexism. And he says that Tear-Partiers accomplish nothing.
No, sir, Rush is a Rushist. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, son of a lawyer/judge, and has never done an honest day's work in his life. His 4 marriages prove that he has no real morality, and no concern for anyone but himself. If he feels the need to say something racist, he just says it... it's that sense of self-entitlement that pervades the right, and he convinces other wingnuts that they're entitled as well.
He's busy digging his hole the last few weeks. It's a short matter of time until he climbs in and covers himself. That he's hoisting himself on his own petard is simply icing on a big, fat, loudmouthed cake. --->JMS

....yeah and hes funny looking too!

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:08 pm

songsmith wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:
gosteelers wrote: we don't need overt racists owning football teams
Can you prove that Rush is a racist?
Rush proves he is a racist over and over again. He brings up race usually once a show lately. And sexism. And he says that Tear-Partiers accomplish nothing.
No, sir, Rush is a Rushist. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, son of a lawyer/judge, and has never done an honest day's work in his life. His 4 marriages prove that he has no real morality, and no concern for anyone but himself. If he feels the need to say something racist, he just says it... it's that sense of self-entitlement that pervades the right, and he convinces other wingnuts that they're entitled as well.
He's busy digging his hole the last few weeks. It's a short matter of time until he climbs in and covers himself. That he's hoisting himself on his own petard is simply icing on a big, fat, loudmouthed cake. --->JMS

Quite easy to say someone is a racist. Can you provide evidence?

Wow, you do seem to know an awful lot about his personal life. Are you a stalker?

Why do you think it is bad for right wingers to speak what is on their minds. Doesn't the First Amendment guarantee that right?

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:30 pm

The way I look at it is like this: The NFL has no room to talk about standards when they allow a convicted animal hater back into the league ...

Flaw · Post by **Flaw** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:21 pm

f.sciarrillo wrote:The way I look at it is like this: The NFL has no room to talk about standards when they allow a convicted animal hater back into the league ...

Hey now just because he trained them to fight, doesn't mean he hates them

. You think Adrain hated Rocky.