No F'n substance. Damn, Bashing is trolling, didn't you learn your leson ?f.sciarrillo wrote:You just mentioned about 98% of the Obama voters ...Hawk wrote:What's pointless is apathy and under educated voters who only know one side of the issue. I don't care how you vote as long as you actually understand what / who you're voting for.Merge wrote: Finally, something I agree with
Obama answers Rockpage right wingers' questions.
-
f.sciarrillo
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:35 am
- Location: Not here ..
No bashing or trolling involved .. Just truth - All you have to do is watch the reports and you will see that the biggest part of the people who voted for him didn't who he was and only voted for him because he wasn't Bush and that 2% voted for him because they know who he was.Hawk wrote:No F'n substance. Damn, Bashing is trolling, didn't you learn your leson ?f.sciarrillo wrote:You just mentioned about 98% of the Obama voters ...Hawk wrote: What's pointless is apathy and under educated voters who only know one side of the issue. I don't care how you vote as long as you actually understand what / who you're voting for.
Source ? Or did you make that up...or did Glen Beck make that up ?f.sciarrillo wrote:No bashing or trolling involved .. Just truth - All you have to do is watch the reports and you will see that the biggest part of the people who voted for him didn't who he was and only voted for him because he wasn't Bush and that 2% voted for him because they know who he was.Hawk wrote:No F'n substance. Damn, Bashing is trolling, didn't you learn your leson ?f.sciarrillo wrote: You just mentioned about 98% of the Obama voters ...
Source please ?
-
f.sciarrillo
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:35 am
- Location: Not here ..
There you go again with glen beck. It was on a couple of the news shows. Reporters went out and asked people saying that they are voting Obama questions, when they asked why they just answered "Change" when asked what changes they couldn't answer them.Hawk wrote:Source ? Or did you make that up...or did Glen Beck make that up ?f.sciarrillo wrote:No bashing or trolling involved .. Just truth - All you have to do is watch the reports and you will see that the biggest part of the people who voted for him didn't who he was and only voted for him because he wasn't Bush and that 2% voted for him because they know who he was.Hawk wrote: No F'n substance. Damn, Bashing is trolling, didn't you learn your leson ?
Source please ?
http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/11/17/ ... he-issues/
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/
-
f.sciarrillo
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:35 am
- Location: Not here ..
What news Channels ? What reporters ?f.sciarrillo wrote:
There you go again with glen beck. It was on a couple of the news shows. Reporters went out and asked people saying that they are voting Obama questions, when they asked why they just answered "Change" when asked what changes they couldn't answer them.
http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/11/17/ ... he-issues/
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/
What a stupid source. where are the facts. I can go out and get as many anti conservative interviews. That does not represent 98% of the people.
From now on I will ignore anything you say that is total nonsense with the sentence: Please forgive this retard as he can only repeat what he has heard and can not think for himself as I have proved too many times to be listed.
-
f.sciarrillo
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:35 am
- Location: Not here ..
The thing with you is that it doesn't matter what source we come up with or what proof we have. You will believe none of it - Plain and simple. I'm not wasting my time looking for more when it won't matter. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, as long as it is fact or truth in your mind.Hawk wrote:What news Channels ? What reporters ?f.sciarrillo wrote:
There you go again with glen beck. It was on a couple of the news shows. Reporters went out and asked people saying that they are voting Obama questions, when they asked why they just answered "Change" when asked what changes they couldn't answer them.
http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/11/17/ ... he-issues/
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/
What a stupid source. where are the facts. I can go out and get as many anti conservative interviews. That does not represent 98% of the people.
From now on I will ignore anything you say that is total nonsense with the sentence: Please forgive this retard as he can only repeat what he has heard and can not think for himself as I have proved too many times to be listed.
And there you go again with the Retard insults. No wonder people are getting fed up with the Liberals. When something comes up to challenge your point of view, you start with the name calling and insults. And you wonder why the polls are so low and Dems are losing seats left and right ... That is like the News. I tried to watch MSNBC this week and the whole time it was nothing but people saying about how stupid the Tea-party goers and Sarah Palin is. There was no substance in why they thought they were stupid, only just that they were stupid. So the conclusion I got from it was this: If you don't agree with us, or believe what we believe, you are stupid. Good way of thinking?
Next subject please ...
I will tell you what - Show me facts and sources that state that the majority of the people who voted for him were all intelligent individuals who knew who they were voting for?
Man, you are so easy at times lol ... Oh, before you start with the Glen Beck stuff again, I don't believe either party is good for this country. In fact, I think King Kong could do better than the Repubs and Dems combined. Other wards, I don't support either of them. I have yet to find one that I would support. I am still hoping and praying that 2012 will change my mind.-
RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:47 pm
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
I've watched his videos before, and you aren't getting my point...Hawk wrote:I'm disappointed in you, not surprised, just disappointed. Don't try and pretend you know what you're talking about if you won't watch his videos as he EXPLAINES the answers to YOUR questions. I knew you are afraid of facts and truth. Fool.RobTheDrummer wrote:So you think it's a good idea to pass a healthcare bill without any questioning?songsmith wrote: Sure, they do. 59 is still a majority. Anything over 50 is a majority, it's just that now we have to sit through filibusters. Speaking of filibusters, does anyone else think that if the GOP calls a filibuster (basically a big, long speech about nothing designed to waste time) they should actually have to get up on the Senate floor and actually filibuster? Apparently, one can call for a filibuster, then just not show up to talk, and it just slows the process even more. That's real problem-solving for Americans, right there.
Anyway, there's talk of passing the Healthcare bill via a process known as reconciliation. It really could happen, but hey, the Repubs broke out the hardball, and can't complain when they get beaned with it. If the GOP's right, and the Dems know they will suffer massive losses in November, maybe they're poisoning the well the way Bush and Cheney did on their way out.--->JMS
He always talks a good game, however what he actually does is not what he says.
What did he say in video part one ? Funny no one said he was wrong. If you watched, what is YOUR take ? Where is your rebutal ?RobTheDrummer wrote:I've watched his videos before, and you aren't getting my point...Hawk wrote:I'm disappointed in you, not surprised, just disappointed. Don't try and pretend you know what you're talking about if you won't watch his videos as he EXPLAINES the answers to YOUR questions. I knew you are afraid of facts and truth. Fool.RobTheDrummer wrote: So you think it's a good idea to pass a healthcare bill without any questioning?
He always talks a good game, however what he actually does is not what he says.
You use so many words to say nothing.f.sciarrillo wrote:The thing with you is that it doesn't matter what source we come up with or what proof we have. You will believe none of it - Plain and simple. I'm not wasting my time looking for more when it won't matter. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, as long as it is fact or truth in your mind.Hawk wrote:What news Channels ? What reporters ?f.sciarrillo wrote:
There you go again with glen beck. It was on a couple of the news shows. Reporters went out and asked people saying that they are voting Obama questions, when they asked why they just answered "Change" when asked what changes they couldn't answer them.
http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/11/17/ ... he-issues/
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/
What a stupid source. where are the facts. I can go out and get as many anti conservative interviews. That does not represent 98% of the people.
From now on I will ignore anything you say that is total nonsense with the sentence: Please forgive this retard as he can only repeat what he has heard and can not think for himself as I have proved too many times to be listed.
And there you go again with the Retard insults. No wonder people are getting fed up with the Liberals. When something comes up to challenge your point of view, you start with the name calling and insults. And you wonder why the polls are so low and Dems are losing seats left and right ... That is like the News. I tried to watch MSNBC this week and the whole time it was nothing but people saying about how stupid the Tea-party goers and Sarah Palin is. There was no substance in why they thought they were stupid, only just that they were stupid. So the conclusion I got from it was this: If you don't agree with us, or believe what we believe, you are stupid. Good way of thinking?
Next subject please ...
I will tell you what - Show me facts and sources that state that the majority of the people who voted for him were all intelligent individuals who knew who they were voting for?
There are all kinds of retards and meanings to the word retard. You are a political retard.
You have never answered some questions I have asked. This proves for everyone who reads these posts that you have no opinion of your own. You can only act like a sheep in a herd guided by a Fox in shepherds clothing.
Fox is strictly a right wing opinion channel. Are you are too retarded to know that ? MSNBC is a left wing opinion channel.
You stated facts with percentages. All i ask was where did you get these facts ? I still ask, where did you get these facts ? You guide me to some stupid video like that represents 98% of the people who voted for Obama. If you actually thought that, then again you show your political retardation.
If you see a theme here, it is not that I'm calling you names at all. I am pointing out that you actually are political retarded. Retard is not a name, it is your inability to comprehend that every other right winger on Rockpage can discuss facts and back up their opinions. You on the other hand, can only troll or bash.
You ARE a political retard. Go get politicaly educated.
-
f.sciarrillo
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:35 am
- Location: Not here ..
The main simple "FACT" is that you have your head so far up Obamas rectum that you wouldn't believe anything that is negatively said about him. So why bother? It is kinda funny because you have such man love for the guy. Come on, tell the truth - You have a life size cardboard of him in your bedroom don't you?Hawk wrote:You use so many words to say nothing.f.sciarrillo wrote:The thing with you is that it doesn't matter what source we come up with or what proof we have. You will believe none of it - Plain and simple. I'm not wasting my time looking for more when it won't matter. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, as long as it is fact or truth in your mind.Hawk wrote: What news Channels ? What reporters ?
What a stupid source. where are the facts. I can go out and get as many anti conservative interviews. That does not represent 98% of the people.
From now on I will ignore anything you say that is total nonsense with the sentence: Please forgive this retard as he can only repeat what he has heard and can not think for himself as I have proved too many times to be listed.
And there you go again with the Retard insults. No wonder people are getting fed up with the Liberals. When something comes up to challenge your point of view, you start with the name calling and insults. And you wonder why the polls are so low and Dems are losing seats left and right ... That is like the News. I tried to watch MSNBC this week and the whole time it was nothing but people saying about how stupid the Tea-party goers and Sarah Palin is. There was no substance in why they thought they were stupid, only just that they were stupid. So the conclusion I got from it was this: If you don't agree with us, or believe what we believe, you are stupid. Good way of thinking?
Next subject please ...
I will tell you what - Show me facts and sources that state that the majority of the people who voted for him were all intelligent individuals who knew who they were voting for?
There are all kinds of retards and meanings to the word retard. You are a political retard.
You have never answered some questions I have asked. This proves for everyone who reads these posts that you have no opinion of your own. You can only act like a sheep in a herd guided by a Fox in shepherds clothing.
Fox is strictly a right wing opinion channel. Are you are too retarded to know that ? MSNBC is a left wing opinion channel.
You stated facts with percentages. All i ask was where did you get these facts ? I still ask, where did you get these facts ? You guide me to some stupid video like that represents 98% of the people who voted for Obama. If you actually thought that, then again you show your political retardation.
If you see a theme here, it is not that I'm calling you names at all. I am pointing out that you actually are political retarded. Retard is not a name, it is your inability to comprehend that every other right winger on Rockpage can discuss facts and back up their opinions. You on the other hand, can only troll or bash.
You ARE a political retard. Go get politicaly educated.
(before you go off on a tangent about Glenn Beck and FOX NEWS, or how stupid I am - you know, the normal liberal mind to combat what is said - It was a JOKE !)Maybe we will luck out and get a Independent in there in 2012. Anything but a Republican or Democrat. Damn, there is that "RETARD" talk again . Drat!
Music Rocks!
Do yopu know the difference between you and a rectum ? A rectum serves a purpose.f.sciarrillo wrote:The main simple "FACT" is that you have your head so far up Obamas rectum that you wouldn't believe anything that is negatively said about him. So why bother? It is kinda funny because you have such man love for the guy. Come on, tell the truth - You have a life size cardboard of him in your bedroom don't you?Hawk wrote:You use so many words to say nothing.f.sciarrillo wrote: The thing with you is that it doesn't matter what source we come up with or what proof we have. You will believe none of it - Plain and simple. I'm not wasting my time looking for more when it won't matter. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, as long as it is fact or truth in your mind.
And there you go again with the Retard insults. No wonder people are getting fed up with the Liberals. When something comes up to challenge your point of view, you start with the name calling and insults. And you wonder why the polls are so low and Dems are losing seats left and right ... That is like the News. I tried to watch MSNBC this week and the whole time it was nothing but people saying about how stupid the Tea-party goers and Sarah Palin is. There was no substance in why they thought they were stupid, only just that they were stupid. So the conclusion I got from it was this: If you don't agree with us, or believe what we believe, you are stupid. Good way of thinking?
Next subject please ...
I will tell you what - Show me facts and sources that state that the majority of the people who voted for him were all intelligent individuals who knew who they were voting for?
There are all kinds of retards and meanings to the word retard. You are a political retard.
You have never answered some questions I have asked. This proves for everyone who reads these posts that you have no opinion of your own. You can only act like a sheep in a herd guided by a Fox in shepherds clothing.
Fox is strictly a right wing opinion channel. Are you are too retarded to know that ? MSNBC is a left wing opinion channel.
You stated facts with percentages. All i ask was where did you get these facts ? I still ask, where did you get these facts ? You guide me to some stupid video like that represents 98% of the people who voted for Obama. If you actually thought that, then again you show your political retardation.
If you see a theme here, it is not that I'm calling you names at all. I am pointing out that you actually are political retarded. Retard is not a name, it is your inability to comprehend that every other right winger on Rockpage can discuss facts and back up their opinions. You on the other hand, can only troll or bash.
You ARE a political retard. Go get politicaly educated.
Maybe we will luck out and get a Independent in there in 2012. Anything but a Republican or Democrat. Damn, there is that "RETARD" talk again . Drat!
So your simple answewr is, "No". You made those percentages up didn't you ? Yet you can spew nonsence with ease.
Try this Frank > in my next post.
Try this Frank. Let's make some attempt at dialog that you can contribute to.
Palin constantly references, "Core conservative values". Can you tell me exactly what these values are ? Or, what does that mean to you ?
Also, Watch the Obama video part 1 I put up. Perhaps you can dispute what he says without the standard cliches and bashes. I mean, honest dialog concerning the stimulus as Obama laid it out to the Republican caucus.
Let's give it a try and see if we can discuss issues.
Palin constantly references, "Core conservative values". Can you tell me exactly what these values are ? Or, what does that mean to you ?
Also, Watch the Obama video part 1 I put up. Perhaps you can dispute what he says without the standard cliches and bashes. I mean, honest dialog concerning the stimulus as Obama laid it out to the Republican caucus.
Let's give it a try and see if we can discuss issues.
-
RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:47 pm
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
I will try with an answer Bill. Palin is not a conservative, she is a Republican and a liar. B. Hussein lies, so it does not matter what he says, he is a politician and they lie.Hawk wrote:Try this Frank. Let's make some attempt at dialog that you can contribute to.
Palin constantly references, "Core conservative values". Can you tell me exactly what these values are ? Or, what does that mean to you ?
Also, Watch the Obama video part 1 I put up. Perhaps you can dispute what he says without the standard cliches and bashes. I mean, honest dialog concerning the stimulus as Obama laid it out to the Republican caucus.
Let's give it a try and see if we can discuss issues.
One cannot lie about facts. They are what they are. Statics are another story. but facts are facts.undercoverjoe wrote:I will try with an answer Bill. Palin is not a conservative, she is a Republican and a liar. B. Hussein lies, so it does not matter what he says, he is a politician and they lie.Hawk wrote:Try this Frank. Let's make some attempt at dialog that you can contribute to.
Palin constantly references, "Core conservative values". Can you tell me exactly what these values are ? Or, what does that mean to you ?
Also, Watch the Obama video part 1 I put up. Perhaps you can dispute what he says without the standard cliches and bashes. I mean, honest dialog concerning the stimulus as Obama laid it out to the Republican caucus.
Let's give it a try and see if we can discuss issues.
At this point in history, Republican vs. Democrat equals conservative vs. liberal. Tea Partiers chanted, "Run Sarah, Run!!" last Saturday at their convention, yet another reason to point at them and shake your head.
Speaking of polls
, here's a telling article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35361201/ns ... york_times
Yeah, I know, MSNBC/CBS. Hey, it was on my MSN homepage, and it couldn't be any more biased than Rasmussen is for Fox.--->JMS
Speaking of polls
, here's a telling article:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35361201/ns ... york_times
Yeah, I know, MSNBC/CBS. Hey, it was on my MSN homepage, and it couldn't be any more biased than Rasmussen is for Fox.--->JMS
Wow, from that same poll:songsmith wrote:At this point in history, Republican vs. Democrat equals conservative vs. liberal. Tea Partiers chanted, "Run Sarah, Run!!" last Saturday at their convention, yet another reason to point at them and shake your head.
Speaking of polls
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35361201/ns ... york_times
Yeah, I know, MSNBC/CBS. Hey, it was on my MSN homepage, and it couldn't be any more biased than Rasmussen is for Fox.--->JMS
"Fewer than 1 in 10 Americans say members of Congress deserve re-election."
That is deep dissatisfaction with this government.
Darn right, the people are pissed that we don't have health insurance reform!undercoverjoe wrote:Wow, from that same poll:songsmith wrote:At this point in history, Republican vs. Democrat equals conservative vs. liberal. Tea Partiers chanted, "Run Sarah, Run!!" last Saturday at their convention, yet another reason to point at them and shake your head.
Speaking of polls
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35361201/ns ... york_times
Yeah, I know, MSNBC/CBS. Hey, it was on my MSN homepage, and it couldn't be any more biased than Rasmussen is for Fox.--->JMS
"Fewer than 1 in 10 Americans say members of Congress deserve re-election."
That is deep dissatisfaction with this government.