Big surprise.

Somebody get him his binky and put him down for his nap, him's eyes are droopy.
Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
Yes he did. All politicians pull that. What's your point?songsmith wrote:Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?[/url]lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
He has never had a valid point. He hates anyone who has more than he does, and wants them punished by taxation by his authoritarian government.lonewolf wrote:Yes he did. All politicians pull that. What's your point?songsmith wrote:Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?[/url]lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
Help what?songsmith wrote:On a brighter note, I did just read that Obama's planning on cap-gains taxation going back up to Reagan %-levels, and ending the Bush Tax Cuts for everyone over $250K yearly. That will help more than anything so far.lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
The Point: If it's okay for a conservative, it's okay for everyone else, and complaining about it is pointless. Clear enough?lonewolf wrote:Yes he did. All politicians pull that. What's your point?songsmith wrote:Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?[/url]lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
Help punish anyone with more than stumpy. He hates those rich.lonewolf wrote:Help what?songsmith wrote:On a brighter note, I did just read that Obama's planning on cap-gains taxation going back up to Reagan %-levels, and ending the Bush Tax Cuts for everyone over $250K yearly. That will help more than anything so far.lonewolf wrote: Isn't that convenient...we'll start cutting the deficit after the election.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-unv ... 1.html?l=1
Why do you think Bush was a conservative? He spent almost as much as socialist NObama.songsmith wrote:The Point: If it's okay for a conservative, it's okay for everyone else, and complaining about it is pointless. Clear enough?lonewolf wrote:Yes he did. All politicians pull that. What's your point?songsmith wrote: Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?[/url]
Poopy-butt's naptime's over!undercoverjoe wrote:He has never had a valid point. He hates anyone who has more than he does, and wants them punished by taxation by his authoritarian government.lonewolf wrote:Yes he did. All politicians pull that. What's your point?songsmith wrote: Didn't Bush set his Tax Breaks For The Rich to end right after he left office? Wasn't that meant to force the next guy to either continue them or face "tax & spend" accusations, which he got anyway?[/url]
That horrible, Satanic DEBT! Duh.lonewolf wrote: Help what?
Because George Walker Bush was, is and always will be a conservative. He was elected by conservatives. He was lionized by conservatives, supported by conservatives, sold to us by the conservative media, and did exactly what all conservative presidents and politicians do: spend money, benefit business, and blame it all on the next guy.undercoverjoe wrote: ]
Why do you think Bush was a conservative? He spent almost as much as socialist NObama.
Oh, yeahhhhhhh. That. The unemployed loser still clinging to some tax issue he made up, a tax credit everybody with children gets...undercoverjoe wrote:NObama increased the DEBT by $5 TRILLION.
The tax cut elimination would have brought in some 100's of millions, but hurt the economy even more.
Funny, a guy who has received straight gummint welfare with his Earned Income Tax Refund is mad that someone else had a tax break.
Could you get any smaller?
Exactly what your illegal Kenyan does, except he blames it all on the last guy.songsmith wrote:did exactly what all conservative presidents and politicians do: spend money, benefit business, and blame it all on the next guy.undercoverjoe wrote: ]
Why do you think Bush was a conservative? He spent almost as much as socialist NObama.
Have you made up an imaginary language where only you can understand it? I said or implied no such thing. When you lose a point, you make up things. What a slimy piece of shit.songsmith wrote:Thanks for admitting Bush is conservative. That's all I wanted, the rest you can pleasure yourself to, if you like.undercoverjoe wrote: [Exactly what your illegal Kenyan does, except he blames it all on the last guy.
Remember, Lean Cuisine. The dog's getting chubby.
Ah, I see. That's why the deficit increases more than 20% year over year with the President's budget. Makes perfect sense. Increase taxes and the deficit explodes. Could it be that anytime a politician raises taxes, he has every intent to spend every penny and then some?songsmith wrote:That horrible, Satanic DEBT! Duh.lonewolf wrote: Help what?
Nonsense. Show me one legit investment expert who espouses this. Bubbles create easy money when smart money pulls out right before the bubble bursts. Ever hear of a pump & dump? A bubble is nothing more that a pump & dump on a mass scale.songsmith wrote: It would also help prevent future investment bubbles, as easy money is easier to risk.
Ah, so raising taxes is "feelgood" legislation. Well, alrighty then! I'm glad to see a proponent finally admit to that.songsmith wrote: It would also help working Americans feel better about the gulf between them and the uber-wealthy, and show some fairness of treatment.
Correct! Business cycles, demographics, productivity, GDP and above all, lack of consumption & uncertainty, are more closely correlated to unemployment.songsmith wrote: In addition, it would prove the hysterics of the rightwing regarding the relationship between taxation and unemployment are completely baseless.
This in no way, shape, or form proves Bush is not a conservative. By not supplying rebuttal to my point, you must admit defeat. Bush is conservative just like you. Once again, you do not make the rules, or set the definitions. The sooner you understand that, and realize nobody supports you here anymore, the less embarrassing it will be for you. You're a nut. That's kind of a sad thing, but I didn't cause it, I just point it out... for fun. Wake up.undercoverjoe wrote:Exactly what your illegal Kenyan does, except he blames it all on the last guy.songsmith wrote: did exactly what all conservative presidents and politicians do: spend money, benefit business, and blame it all on the next guy.